Copyright © Richard Perry 2018. Copyright commencement date is 14th February 2018.
Richard Perry Versus.

Crime carried out by corrupt Defendant Judges supporting the other

Defendants.

Besides  

the  

apalling  

attitude  

of  

the  

UK  

towards  

IP  

rights,  

and  

besides  

the  

recklessness  

of  

the  

Defendants,  

the  

mortifying

amount of Judicial corruption that I have faced is the biggest disappointment and let down for me and for the entire nation.

In  

2012/13  

I  

was  

taken  

to  

Court  

by  

some  

of  

the  

Defendants  

(FH  

Brundle,  

Betafence  

etc)  

for  

their  

claim  

of  

unjustified  

threats

because  

I  

demanded  

  

that  

they  

pay  

me  

for  

the  

use  

of  

my  

work  

and  

patents  

that  

they  

had  

stolen.  

They  

immediately  

employed  

a

large  

London  

law  

firm  

(Collyer  

Bristow  

LLp  

who  

are  

also  

now  

Defandants)  

to  

file  

and  

proceed  

with  

a  

claim  

in  

a  

United  

Kingdom

Court  

of  

Law  

that  

was  

based  

on  

perjury,  

false  

witness  

testimony  

and  

unlawful  

legal  

tactics.

This  

is  

because  

they  

were  

bringing  

a

civil  

claim  

to  

conceal,  

what  

is  

now  

proven  

in  

evidence  

to  

be,  

a  

substantial  

criminal  

conspiracy  

to  

steal  

and  

defraud  

my  

IP  

rights,

(now  

estimated  

to  

be  

worth  

over  

100million  

GBP)  

  

which  

makes  

a  

mockery  

of  

the  

enitre  

justice  

system.  

The  

firms  

and  

law  

firms

involved  

in  

this  

dreadful  

abuse  

of  

the  

legal  

process,  

breached  

their  

oaths  

and  

legal  

practice  

licences,  

and  

were  

aided  

and

abetted  

by  

several  

Judges  

who  

made  

corrupt  

and  

fraudulent  

judgements  

against  

me.  

The  

Judges  

knew  

all  

along  

and  

were

extremely  

well  

aware  

that  

I  

have  

been  

a  

victim  

of  

my  

opponents’  

serious  

crime  

and  

I  

had  

a  

mountain  

of  

evidence  

to  

prove  

it.

The  

judges  

aided  

the  

Defendants  

for  

the  

hidden  

agenda  

of  

rubbishing  

intellectual  

property  

rights;  

to  

prevent  

individuals

enforcing  

their  

rights  

against  

large  

corporations  

for  

large  

sums  

of  

money  

and  

when  

it  

would  

be  

obvious  

to  

a  

child  

that  

my

patents have been stolen.

Early  

on  

in  

proceedings  

I  

was  

discussing  

with  

a  

Judge  

  

(Arnold,  

IPEC)  

a  

level  

of  

damages  

of  

around  

400,000  

for  

the  

loss  

of  

only

one  

patent  

and  

where  

the  

Defendants  

themselves  

had  

submitted  

figures  

stating  

they  

had  

made  

more  

than  

half  

a  

million

pounds.

The  

law  

says  

(Apple  

vs.  

Samsung)  

that  

I  

would  

be  

entitled  

to  

the  

turnover  

made  

from  

the  

patent  

fraud/theft.  

 

At  

the  

time

400k  

would  

have  

just  

about  

been  

enough  

to  

rescue  

my  

loss.  

The  

judge  

told  

me  

that  

I  

would  

have  

to  

be  

a  

large  

manufacturer  

to

get  

almost  

anything  

at  

all  

or  

anywhere  

near  

that  

amount  

of  

money.  

The  

hearing  

went  

more  

or  

less  

like  

this:  

Scoff,  

Scoff,

Intellectual  

Property?  

We  

don’t  

want  

anything  

like  

that

  

in  

this  

Country  

ugh

.  

You  

definitely  

won’t  

get  

anywhere  

near  

 1.50  

in

damages  

in  

this  

court.  

 

This  

is  

my  

version  

of  

it  

but  

the  

copy  

of  

the  

order  

is  

found  

under  

the  

Evidence  

page  

under  

Published  

Civil

Judgements  

where  

the  

actual  

order  

makes  

a  

statement  

to  

this  

effect.  

Years  

later  

I  

subsequently  

asked  

this  

judge  

to  

explain  

his

appalling  

attitude  

to  

the  

value  

of  

IP  

rights  

and  

demanded  

an  

explanation  

as  

to  

why  

I  

‘would  

have  

to  

be  

a  

large  

manufacturer’  

to

be  

entitled  

to  

the  

money  

and  

protection  

of  

rights  

that  

I  

paid  

the  

UK  

Government  

for.  

He  

replied  

with  

the  

answer  

“it’s  

not  

my  

job  

to

answer  

questions  

like  

that”.  

That  

judge  

even  

put  

his  

statement  

in  

his  

own  

judgement,  

therefore  

proving  

the  

United  

Kingdom’s

sinister  

attitude  

towards  

people’s  

intellectual  

property  

rights  

and  

vast  

investments.  

There  

is  

not  

a  

single  

case  

in  

the  

history  

of

the  

United  

Kingdom  

where  

an  

individual  

has  

successfully  

sued  

a  

group  

of  

worldwide  

corporations  

for  

millions  

of  

pounds  

in

damages  

for  

intellectual  

property  

crime,  

because  

in  

the  

UK  

intellectual  

property  

is  

seen  

as  

completely  

worthless.  

My  

allegations

and statements are proven in undeniable and indisputable evidence, hence the criminal charges I am now going to bring.

During  

the  

hearings  

and  

trials  

in  

Courts  

between  

2013  

-  

2017  

and  

all  

over  

the  

UK  

from  

one  

side  

of  

the  

Country  

to  

the  

other  

and

spanning  

a  

period  

of  

five  

years,  

all  

I  

experienced  

was  

ridicule  

and  

corruption  

for  

trying  

to  

stand  

up  

for  

my  

rights  

and  

for

everyone  

else’s  

rights.  

On  

some  

occasions  

some  

Judges  

refused  

to  

even  

allow  

me  

to  

speak  

or  

simply  

cut  

me  

short  

mid

sentence  

or  

twisted  

everything  

I  

said  

back  

upon  

me,  

whilst  

the  

Defendants  

and  

their  

law  

firms  

stood  

there  

in  

Court  

lying  

through

their  

teeth  

and  

submitting  

massive  

files  

hundreds  

of  

pages  

thick  

of  

false  

and  

misleading  

documents  

to  

support  

their  

case.

Hundreds  

of  

pages  

of  

documents  

that  

they  

knew  

to  

be  

untrue  

and/or  

misleading  

for  

the  

purpose  

of  

concealing  

serious  

and

organised  

crime.  

One  

Judge  

who  

made  

several  

fraudulent  

judgements  

against  

me  

(Richard  

Hacon)  

claimed  

that  

‘he  

couldn’t

see  

how  

they  

have  

done  

anything  

wrong’  

whilst  

he  

knew  

that  

the  

Defendants  

couldn’t  

produce  

the  

evidence  

that  

they  

would

have  

to  

produce  

to  

give  

themselves  

an  

alibi  

therefore  

proving  

my  

allegations.  

The  

evidence  

was  

confirmed  

and  

proven  

by  

the

content  

of  

the  

documents  

that  

they  

themselves  

had  

submitted  

to  

the  

court  

to  

try  

to  

conceal  

their  

crime.  

The  

judge  

also  

refused

me  

access  

to  

any  

and  

all  

evidence  

that  

would  

even  

further  

prove  

my  

allegations  

and  

he  

made  

fraudulent  

order  

after  

fraudulent

order.

Link to published civil judgements Link to judicial related correspondence

Fraudulent  

use  

&  

abuse  

of  

the  

‘slip  

rule’:  

The  

same  

judge  

involved  

making  

all  

the  

fraudulent  

decisions  

Richard  

Hacon  

even

deliberately  

falsified  

the  

date  

on  

his  

April  

2017  

judgement  

to  

date  

it  

as  

  

being  

made  

in  

June.  

He  

was  

awaiting  

my  

reply  

to  

the

hearing  

and  

after  

he  

had  

recieved  

it  

he  

then  

deliberately  

amended  

his  

fraudulent  

restraining  

order  

against  

me  

to  

make  

the

consequences  

of  

it  

even  

worse,  

and  

then  

claimed  

the  

reason  

for  

using  

the  

slip  

rule  

for  

the  

amendment  

was  

that  

he  

put  

the

wrong  

date  

on  

the  

judgement.

The  

proof  

that  

the  

amendement  

was  

further  

damaging  

is  

that  

he  

didn’t  

just  

amend  

the  

date  

from

April  

to  

June  

-  

he  

amended  

the  

judgement  

to  

make  

the  

order  

more  

damaging  

and  

had  

plotted  

in  

advance  

the  

misuse  

of  

the

rule  

to  

try  

to  

conceal  

his  

criminal  

offence,  

and  

it’s  

called  

fraud.

This  

will  

also  

be  

put  

to  

the  

Jury  

because  

it  

is  

now  

an  

undeniable

and  

inexcusable  

pattern  

of  

participation  

in  

serious  

crime.  

This  

person  

has  

made  

abusive  

and  

fraudulent  

order,  

after  

abusive

and  

fraudulent  

order.  

He  

has  

made  

fraudulent  

judgements,  

ordered  

contempt  

of  

court  

costs  

against  

me  

when  

I  

lectured  

him  

of

aiding  

and  

abetting  

(in  

my  

own  

words  

because  

at  

the  

time  

I  

didn’t  

know  

what  

aiding  

and  

abetting  

was),  

then  

made  

injunctions,

restraining  

orders,  

more  

restraining  

orders  

and  

costs  

orders  

whilst  

denying  

me  

all  

access  

to  

the  

evidence  

that  

he  

knew  

proved

serious  

and  

organised  

crime  

committed  

against  

me  

by  

the  

other  

Defendants.  

In  

the  

April  

2017  

hearing,  

when  

the  

Defendants

FH  

Brundle  

and  

Betafence  

were  

fraudulently  

applying  

for  

their  

2nd  

restraining  

order  

against  

me,  

he  

asked  

the  

defending

barrister:  

‘what  

if  

the  

bankruptcy  

order  

was  

obtained  

through  

fraud’  

and  

the  

barrister  

said:  

‘but  

you  

said  

there  

wasn’t  

any’.

Richard  

Hacon  

then  

says:  

“oh,  

yeah.  

Well  

I  

am  

satisfied  

that  

Mr.  

Perry  

has  

continued  

making  

threats….’  

(because  

I  

had  

applied

to  

rescind  

the  

bankruptcy  

order)  

and  

then  

made  

another  

fraudulent  

Judgement  

against  

me  

and  

yet  

didn’t  

order  

any  

costs  

at  

all

to  

the  

Defendants  

when  

in  

every  

other  

hearing  

he  

had  

awarded  

costs  

after  

costs.  

He  

didn’t  

award  

the  

twenty  

thousand  

pounds

in  

costs  

they  

were  

aksing  

for  

because  

he  

knew  

that  

what  

they  

were  

doing  

was  

breaking  

the  

law.  

  

I  

will  

be  

demanding  

that  

this

person is removed from judicial office immediately and jailed for his involvement.

At  

another  

hearing  

in  

Sept  

2015  

before  

the  

same  

judge  

Richard  

Hacon  

where  

I  

was  

making  

my  

first  

claim  

against  

some  

of  

the

Defendants  

in  

the  

civil  

courts,  

he  

more  

or  

less  

refused  

to  

allow  

me  

to  

speak,  

would  

not  

listen  

at  

all  

to  

the  

long  

list  

of  

offences

that  

I  

alleged  

had  

been  

committed,  

and  

instead  

ordered  

a  

restraining  

order  

because  

I  

didn’t  

have  

a  

‘right  

of  

action’  

because  

I

had  

been  

made  

bankrupt  

-  

which,  

within  

the  

law  

was  

a  

judgement  

that  

he  

could  

make,  

However.  

However.  

Being  

in  

a  

position

of  

Judicial  

Authority  

and  

when  

you  

are  

presented  

with  

undeniable  

and  

indisputable  

evidence  

of  

serious  

and  

organised  

crime,

surely  

you  

use  

your

Authority  

to  

further  

investigate,  

adjourn  

pending  

a  

formal  

investigation,  

make  

some  

sort  

of  

order  

to  

protect

the  

victim  

‘deliver  

thee  

from  

the  

hands  

of  

thy  

oppressors’  

(bible  

verses)  

or  

at  

least  

allow  

a  

case  

to  

proceed  

knowing  

that  

the

bankruptcy  

order  

has  

been  

obtained  

through  

crime.  

But  

no  

-  

not  

this  

judge  

and  

not  

in  

the  

United  

Shit  

Hole  

Kingdom  

-  

the  

land

of  

cheats  

and  

liars.  

God’s  

toilet;  

the  

land  

of  

shit.  

He  

further  

exercised  

his  

judical  

authority  

to  

try  

to  

make  

what  

is  

basically  

a

gagging  

order  

to  

try  

to  

prevent  

me  

from  

pursuing  

my  

claims  

to  

enforce  

my  

intellectual  

property  

rights,  

regardless  

of  

his

undeniable  

awareness  

that  

the  

barristers  

standing  

before  

him  

had  

brought  

a  

case  

based  

on  

false  

witness  

testimony  

and

perjury.  

During  

the  

hearing  

when  

I  

realised  

I  

wasn’t  

going  

to  

get  

any  

fairness  

at  

all  

I  

put  

a  

simple  

question  

to  

Richard  

Hacon

which  

was:  

‘what  

if  

i’m  

right  

in  

all  

of  

this?’  

and  

at  

first  

he  

ignored  

me.  

I  

then  

asked  

the  

question  

again:  

‘what  

if  

i’m  

right  

in  

all  

of

this  

-  

what  

are  

you  

going  

to  

do  

about  

it?’  

he  

then  

replied:  

‘if  

there  

is  

anything  

that  

vindicates  

what  

you  

say,  

then  

there  

will  

be

criminal  

sanctions’.  

He  

then  

continued  

to  

deny  

me  

access  

to  

any  

evidence  

and  

continued  

to  

make  

a  

highly  

defamatory  

and

corrupted  

restraining  

order  

against  

me,  

despite  

me  

pointing  

out  

that  

the  

defending  

law  

firm  

had  

breached  

their  

practice

licences and were knowingly participating in serious crime that undermines the entire economy.

Recently  

in  

2017  

and  

after  

more  

judgements  

had  

been  

made  

and  

now  

being  

at  

the  

cusp  

of  

the  

biggest  

criminal  

case  

in  

the

history  

of  

the  

United  

Kingdom  

in  

relation  

to  

intellectual  

property  

crime,  

I  

emailed  

the  

Judge  

and  

asked  

him  

another  

question

which  

was  

along  

the  

lines  

of:  

‘now  

that  

it  

is  

obvious  

that  

the  

Defendants  

have  

brought  

cases  

based  

on  

false  

witness  

testimony

and  

perjury  

and  

have  

perpetrated  

serious  

crime  

against  

me,  

do  

you  

now  

accept  

that  

you  

may  

have  

been  

duped  

or  

deliberately

mislead  

by  

the  

Defendants?’.  

He  

replied  

stating  

that  

he  

didn’t  

answer  

questions,  

(so  

basically  

an  

omission  

of  

guilty  

mind;  

mens

rea)  

although  

I  

had  

pointed  

out  

that  

there  

is  

an  

active  

criminal  

investigation  

and  

that  

he  

would  

be  

a  

named  

Defendant.  

  

I  

tried

extending  

the  

olive  

branch  

once  

again  

so  

that  

he  

could  

get  

his  

act  

together  

and  

do  

something,  

anything,  

to  

try  

to  

unwind  

this

situation  

that  

he  

played  

a  

big  

part  

in  

creating  

and  

put  

it  

right.  

He  

refused.  

I  

had  

also  

asked  

him  

how  

would  

he  

feel  

if  

this  

was

being  

done  

to  

him  

or  

his  

children?  

He  

ignored  

the  

question  

and  

continued  

being  

complicit  

in  

crime.  

That  

really  

shows  

the

simpleness  

and  

ugliness  

of  

this  

crime  

-  

if  

this  

was  

being  

done  

to  

them  

and  

their  

children  

they  

would  

be  

outraged  

and  

they

would be using all of the their judicial powers to put the criminals in jail.

During  

another  

hearing  

before  

his  

colleague  

Judge  

Mann  

on  

24th  

February  

2017  

and  

in  

yet  

another  

application  

to  

subpoena

evidence,  

Judge  

Mann  

must  

have  

realised  

the  

seriousness  

of  

the  

situation  

and  

ordered  

that  

a  

barrister  

from  

‘clips’  

(which  

is  

a

pro  

bono  

unit)  

act  

for  

me  

at  

my  

hearing.  

I  

initially  

said  

‘no’  

because  

I  

just  

dont  

trust  

any  

of  

these  

wretched  

people  

any  

more  

and

have  

lost  

all  

faith  

in  

UK  

Justice.  

However  

the  

judge  

insisted,  

and  

so  

I  

had  

to  

let  

the  

barrister  

act  

for  

me.  

Initially  

the  

barrister  

just

didn’t  

believe  

me  

because  

my  

allegations  

highlight  

such  

dark  

and  

seedy  

law  

practices  

and  

he  

just  

didn’t  

believe  

that  

a  

large

law  

firm  

would  

commit  

such  

serious  

offences  

to  

conceal  

crime  

to  

try  

to  

get  

a  

‘win’  

at  

any  

expense.  

So  

we  

agreed  

that  

I  

would

do  

the  

talking  

to  

the  

Judge  

and  

that  

the  

barrister  

would  

just  

say  

the  

legal  

bit  

at  

the  

end.  

During  

the  

hearing  

I  

pointed  

out  

why  

I

wanted  

the  

evidence  

which  

was  

to  

overcome  

the  

restrictions  

of  

the  

bankrupty  

order  

and  

restraining  

order  

so  

that  

my  

claim

could  

proceed  

due  

to  

their  

being  

obvious  

crime.

The  

judge  

asked  

me  

what  

evidence  

I  

wanted  

and  

I  

gave  

him  

a  

big  

list.  

Whilst  

I

was  

speaking  

to  

the  

Judge  

the  

barrister  

was  

sitting  

with  

his  

hand  

over  

his  

face  

to  

try  

to  

get  

away  

from  

the  

whole  

thing  

and

make  

it  

look  

like  

he  

wasn’t  

supporting  

anything  

I  

was  

saying,  

because  

initially  

he  

still  

didn’t  

believe  

me.  

I  

then  

presented  

more

and  

more  

undeniable  

and  

indisputable  

evidence  

to  

the  

Judge  

and  

to  

some  

degree  

the  

judge  

clearly  

understood  

crime  

had

been  

committed  

and  

asked  

me  

a  

question  

along  

the  

lines  

of:  

“so  

take  

it  

that  

you’re  

under  

oath  

now,  

you’re  

saying  

to  

me  

that

there  

has  

been  

a  

criminal  

conspiracy  

against  

you  

and  

that  

others  

have  

become  

involved  

further  

down  

the  

line  

and  

Collyer

Bristow  

law  

firm  

have  

been  

complicit  

in  

this?”  

I  

replied:  

“that  

is  

exactly  

what  

i’m  

saying  

and  

here  

is  

the  

evidence  

in  

this  

file  

that

proves  

it”.  

  

The  

barrister  

who  

had  

been  

listening  

to  

this  

conversation  

had  

now  

taken  

his  

hand  

away  

from  

his  

face  

and  

was

sitting  

upright  

and  

now  

paying  

proper  

attention.  

He  

saw  

that  

I  

wasn’t  

going  

to  

waiver  

under  

pressure  

and  

that  

I  

was  

sticking  

to

my  

allegations.  

After  

I  

had  

finished  

speaking,  

he  

then  

stood  

up  

and  

said  

to  

the  

Judge:  

“well  

if  

that  

is  

true  

what  

Mr.  

Perry  

is

saying,  

then  

that  

is  

what  

the  

whole  

thing  

is  

all  

about”  

(meaning  

the  

purpose  

of  

the  

entire  

justice  

system).  

He  

then  

continued

speaking  

for  

me  

and  

said  

to  

the  

judge  

‘well  

in  

this  

case,  

if  

there  

is  

any  

bar  

to  

be  

set  

to  

allow  

evidence  

to  

be  

adduced  

then  

that

bar  

should  

be  

fairly  

low,  

if  

there  

should  

be  

any  

bar  

at  

all’.  

The  

judge  

quickly  

dismissed  

what  

both  

of  

us  

were  

saying  

and  

then

went  

on  

to  

make  

another  

corrupt  

and  

fraudulent  

judgement  

against  

me  

and  

denied  

access  

to  

the  

evidence  

once  

again  

giving

the  

reason  

that  

because  

the  

main  

hearing  

was  

only  

a  

week  

away  

the  

other  

side  

wouldn’t  

have  

chance  

to  

respond.  

That  

is

abuse  

of  

the  

administration  

of  

justice  

and  

perverting  

the  

course  

of  

justice.  

To  

highlight  

what  

is  

going  

on  

in  

that  

Rolls  

Building,

when  

the  

Defendants  

lodged  

their  

application  

for  

yet  

another  

restraining  

order,  

I  

was  

only  

given  

three  

working  

days  

to  

read,

respond  

and  

put  

a  

full  

defence  

to  

hundreds  

of  

pages  

of  

false  

evidence  

and  

case  

law,  

that  

for  

an  

individual  

untrained  

in  

the  

legal

profession  

is  

terrifying.  

Again  

I  

was  

blocked  

from  

all  

evidence  

because  

the  

Defendants  

‘have  

to  

have  

a  

full  

seven  

days  

to

respond’ yet i was only given three. These are unfair and corrupted proceedings. It is abuse of the adminstration of justice.

I

t  

was  

ordered  

by  

Justice  

Arnold  

before  

the  

first  

trial  

in  

the  

civil  

case  

that  

I  

could  

bring  

components  

of  

the  

offending  

product  

to

court  

to  

show  

how  

it  

worked  

in  

relation  

to  

my  

patent  

claims.  

Proof  

in  

the  

order  

found  

in  

the  

20  

Section  

White  

Numbered  

Bundle.

The  

Defending  

law  

firms  

told  

me  

they  

would  

bring  

the  

parts  

so  

that  

I  

didn’t  

have  

to  

and  

then  

deliberately  

attended  

the  

trial

without  

the  

parts  

so  

that  

I  

couldn’t  

demonstrate  

how  

the  

product  

infringed  

my  

patent.  

I  

informed  

the  

Judge  

of  

this  

deception  

and

abuse  

of  

process  

and  

he  

refused  

to  

adjourn  

despite  

obvious  

concealment  

by  

the  

other  

side.  

To  

add  

further  

mockery  

to  

this

entire  

situation  

this  

same  

Judge  

later  

denied  

me  

access  

to  

the  

evidence  

that  

would  

prove  

an  

entire  

range  

of  

serious  

offences

and  

then  

made  

judgements  

against  

me  

for  

his  

reason  

that  

I  

didn’t  

have  

enough  

or  

any  

evidence  

-  

because  

he  

denied  

me  

all

access  

to  

it!  

This  

is  

Judicial  

crime  

and  

I  

now  

have  

a  

pattern  

of  

this  

Judge’s  

lawbreaking  

and  

criminal  

behaviour  

in  

evidence  

and

in  

his  

own  

words.  

That  

particular  

Judge  

is  

also  

a  

Defendant  

in  

my  

claim.  

That  

Judge  

Richard  

Hacon  

was  

subsequently  

over-

ruled  

or  

contradicted  

at  

least  

twice  

by  

his  

own  

colleagues

  

Judge  

Colin  

Birss,  

who  

also  

made  

another  

Judgement  

on  

June  

14th

the  

summer  

of  

2017  

that  

stated  

in  

the  

ruling:  

the  

true  

purpose  

for  

requesting  

the  

evidence  

is  

to  

support  

Mr.Perry’s  

claim  

for

conspiracy  

and  

fraud  

in  

order  

to  

prove  

those  

documents  

[  

that  

the  

Defendants  

would  

have  

to  

produce  

to  

give  

an  

alibi  

]  

don’t

exist.  

Therefore  

again  

an  

admission  

by  

a  

judge  

that  

can  

clearly  

see  

from  

the  

evidence  

that  

the  

Defendants  

have  

carried  

out

serious  

crime  

against  

me  

and  

yet  

low  

and  

behold  

I  

was  

once  

again  

denied  

access  

to  

the  

evidence  

and  

had  

my  

application

rubbished  

and  

ridiculed.  

  

This  

judge  

Birss  

who  

is  

also  

a  

named  

Defendant  

uses  

all  

of  

his  

efforts  

to  

dismiss  

everything  

I  

said  

in

my  

Court  

bundle  

and  

yet  

he  

clearly  

identifies  

some  

of  

the  

suspects,  

the  

fact  

that  

the  

Police  

refuse  

to  

co-operate  

and  

tried  

to

throw  

off  

the  

case,  

the  

trustees  

and  

Official  

Receiver  

are  

complicit  

in  

the  

situation,  

and  

that  

there  

are  

more  

parties  

and  

more

products  

involved  

(Birkdale,  

Abernethie,  

Simpson  

Strong  

Tie  

etc.).  

He  

also  

admits  

and  

supports  

the  

fact  

that  

I  

have  

asked  

for

evidence  

over  

24  

times  

and  

claims  

that  

i’m  

abusing  

the  

process  

when  

he  

knows  

the  

evidence  

would  

prove  

my  

allegations.  

This

is  

the  

ugly  

face  

of  

corruption,  

it  

is  

abuse  

of  

the  

administration  

of  

Justice  

and  

this  

person  

should  

also  

be  

removed  

from  

Judicial

Office.  

It  

doesn’t  

matter  

how  

long  

he’s  

been  

there  

-  

these  

are  

low  

level  

ranking  

Judges  

conspiring  

amongst  

themselves  

to

commit misconduct in public office and refuse to enforce IP rights.

I  

later  

sent  

a  

letter  

to  

Judge  

Mann  

informing  

him  

that  

I  

would  

be  

bringing  

criminal  

charges  

against  

the  

Defendants.  

I  

asked  

him  

if

he  

thought  

that  

it  

was  

a  

fair  

and  

just  

decision  

to  

block  

access  

to  

evidence  

and  

refuse  

to  

adjorn  

because  

he  

claimed  

that  

court

time  

was  

more  

important  

than  

delivering  

fair  

and  

proper  

justice.  

I  

also  

asked  

him  

to  

provide  

a  

legal  

reason  

why  

he  

denied  

me

access  

to  

the  

evidence  

if  

it  

wasn’t  

to  

carry  

out  

the  

United  

Kingdom  

agenda  

of  

refusing  

to  

recognise  

or  

enforce  

intellectual

property  

rights  

under  

any  

circumstances  

whatsosever.  

He  

replied  

stating  

that  

his  

reason  

was  

because  

I  

had  

a  

restraining  

order

against  

me!  

The  

whole  

point  

of  

the  

entire  

hearing  

was  

to  

subpoena  

evidence  

for  

use  

in  

a  

hearing  

the  

following  

week  

to  

rescind

the  

restraining  

order!!!  

This  

whole  

situation  

is  

seedy,  

unethical,  

immoral  

and  

criminal.  

This  

is  

the  

High  

Court  

of  

the  

United

Kingdom  

being  

fucked  

over  

and  

ruined  

by  

gutless  

timid  

little  

fuddy  

duddy  

men  

who  

don’t  

have  

any  

strength  

of  

character  

or

integrity  

and  

who  

so  

easily  

bow  

to  

the  

Government  

agenda  

of  

rubbishing  

intellectual  

property  

rights,  

depsite  

them  

having  

been

paid  

for  

those  

rights.

These  

pathetic  

little  

men  

all  

want  

to  

be  

called  

‘your  

Honour’  

and  

‘My  

Lord’  

and  

all  

this  

shit,  

when  

they  

don’t

have any integrity or any conscience and don’t know the meaning of the word ‘honour’.

I  

wish  

I  

had  

power  

to  

remove  

these  

people  

from  

any  

position  

of  

Authority  

because  

I  

would  

rip  

out  

corruption  

from  

our  

system

and  

install  

incorruptible,  

unwaivering  

iron  

fisted  

men  

who  

aren’t  

afraid  

to  

deliver  

thundering  

blows  

upon  

criminals  

that  

are

destroying  

our  

Country.  

I  

would  

rain  

down  

Justice  

on  

these  

people,  

pound  

of  

the  

gavel  

after  

pound  

of  

the  

gavel,  

beating  

them

into  

oblivion  

to  

send  

the  

message  

out  

that  

this  

is  

the  

fucking  

United  

Kingdom  

and  

we  

are  

rock  

solid  

and  

incorruptible!!  

If  

you

dare  

to  

think  

about  

committing  

crimes  

here  

or  

if  

even  

a  

strain  

of  

doing  

harm  

to  

others  

weaves  

its  

way  

into  

your  

tiny  

little  

mind,

you  

will  

face  

a  

punishment  

so  

twisted  

and  

ugly  

that  

you’ll  

wish  

you  

had  

never  

set  

foot  

in  

the  

Country.  

  

  

But  

i’m  

dreaming  

-  

you

don’t  

get  

that  

standard  

of  

Rule  

of  

Law  

in  

that  

little  

cesspool  

of  

corruption  

on  

that  

shitty  

little  

island  

in  

the  

middle  

of  

the  

North

Atlantic.  

All  

they  

want  

to  

do  

is  

fuck  

one  

another  

over,  

keep  

the  

foreigners  

out  

and  

watch  

their  

nation  

spiral  

further  

and  

further

down  

into  

a  

4th  

world  

state  

of  

affairs,  

plagued  

by  

debt,  

crime  

and  

a  

lack  

of  

humanity  

and  

where  

all  

the  

goodness  

has  

been

drained from the land.

The  

judges  

involved  

in  

this  

situation  

in  

the  

civil  

courts  

continued  

to  

deny  

me  

all  

access  

to  

the  

evidence  

and  

even  

blocked  

me

from  

obtaining  

transcripts  

of  

the  

court  

tapes  

because  

they  

wanted  

to  

protect  

themselves  

and  

cover  

their  

tracks  

from  

their

crimes  

and  

fraudulent  

judgements  

that  

has  

been  

recorded  

on  

the  

court  

tapes.  

I  

still  

have  

two  

appeals  

left  

in  

those  

cases  

but

I’ve  

lost  

all  

faith  

in  

the  

United  

Kingdom  

corrupt  

civil  

courts.  

Hundreds  

of  

years  

of  

legal  

precedent  

being  

destroyed  

by  

fuddy

duddy useless old men who hate profit and despise success because they haven’t made it.

Basically  

the  

Judges  

involved  

(and  

there  

are  

about  

seven  

of  

them)  

know  

that  

I  

have  

been  

targeted  

by  

organised  

crime  

and

have  

taken  

action  

to  

support  

it  

and  

allow  

it  

to  

continue.  

When  

I  

made  

complaints  

to  

both  

the  

Lord  

Chief  

Justice  

and  

the

Judicial  

Conduct  

Office  

I  

was  

shockingly  

told  

that  

they  

‘didn’t  

know  

what  

misconduct  

is’  

and  

that  

my  

complaints  

were

‘vexatious’.  

They  

refused  

to  

take  

any  

action  

whatsoever  

and  

authored  

letters  

to  

me  

in  

a  

fraudulent  

manner  

to  

prevent  

them

from  

having  

to  

investigate.

This  

is  

called  

perverting  

the  

course  

of  

justice,  

abuse  

of  

the  

administration  

of  

justice,  

fraud  

by  

abuse

of  

position  

and  

again,  

-  

simply  

down  

right  

disgraceful  

and  

immoral.  

Copies  

of  

these  

letters  

and  

correspondences  

can  

be  

found

in  

the  

evidence  

page  

or  

through  

the  

buttons  

below.  

I  

asked  

different  

Courts  

to  

subpoena  

evidence  

over  

25  

times  

and  

was

blocked  

every  

time  

whilst  

being  

defenceless  

and  

suffering  

immeasurable  

loss.  

These  

events  

are  

crimes  

against  

humanity  

and

it is the ugly face of corruption.

During   proceedings   at   Bristol   County   Court   I   was   again   denied   all   access   to   any   evidence   in   my   appeal   to   rescind   the bankruptcy   order   against   me   obtained   through   fraud   and   serious   crime.   The   Bristol   judge   Patrick   McCahill   made   an   order against   me   denying   all   access   to   the   evidence   that   I   requested   to   be   subpoenaed   to   use   in   my   hearing.   His   order   says   : subpoena   of   evidence   refused   (july   2015).      He   then   made   a   second   and   yet   another   corrupt   and   criminal   judgement   denying the   recission   of   the   bankruptcy   order   for   the   reason   stating   that   I   didn’t   have   any,   or   a   high   enough   level   of,   evidence   -   once again   because   he   deliberately   denied   me   access   to   it.   To   really   top   this   off   and   highlight   the   extreme   corruption   going   on   in this,   he   then   drafted   an   order   and   stated:   “this   new   claim   form   alleges   not   only   patent   infringement   but   also   conspiracy   to cheat,   steal   and   defraud”   which   is   an   outright   lie. The   claim   form   alleged   patent   infringement   only    because   the   Wiltshire   Police deliberately   misadvised   me   and   misled   me   based   on   what   the   Defendants   had   told   them.   At   the   time   I   did   not   know   that conspiracy   was   an   actual   offence. The   word   ‘conspiracy’   didn’t   appear   in   a   single   document   that   I   had   written   at   any   time   prior to   the   judgement   -   over   a   thousand   pages,   and   therefore   I   could   not   have   claimed   for   this   offence   at   that   time.      The   reason that   he   made   that   statement   was   to   try   to   stop   later   attempts   of   claiming   conspiracy   and   fraud   which   hasn’t   ever   been   litigated in   any   Court   as   of   yet   and   for   the   reason   that   the   same   case   cannot   be   litigated   twice. A   copy   of   the   claim   form   is   found   under the   Evidence   page   along   with   the   published   judgement   and   my   explanation   of   it.   That   judgement   is   criminal.   He   later   refused to   answer   my   questions   put   to   him   in   a   criminal   investigation   and   he   will   be   a   named   Defandant.   His   actions   were   deliberately protecting   my   opponents   in   the   light   of   undeniable   and   indisputable   evidence.   That   is   crime.   That   is   a   breach   of   EU   treaties,   it is   abuse   of   the   constitution,   it   is   abuse   of   the   administration   of   justice,   it   is   perverting   the   course   of   justice   and   it   is   United Kingdom   Government   corruption.   That   Judge   has   also   been   reported   to   the   Police   and   to   Action   Fraud   and   I   have   received correspondence   from   them   informing   me   that   my   complaint   is   open   and   active.   These   people   do   not   deserve   to   hold   judicial office.   It   is   a   public   disgrace   and   belittles   and   ridicules   the   efforts   of   everyone   in   the   Country   making   an   honest   contribution   to it. The   undeniable   evidence   that   I   do   have   such   as   the   unlawful   use   of   my   name   on   the   purchase   orders   of   the   Defendants   used to   order   the   offending   products,   the   proof   of   a   criminal   conspiracy,   proof   of   fraud   and   perjury   was   completely   ignored   by   all   of the   Judges   who   heavily   supported   the   national   and   worldwide   firms   who   have   bribed   and   influenced   the   United   Kingdom Government   into   supporting   their   lawlessness.   I   have   undeniable   evidence   of   this   found   under   the   evidence   tab.   I   have received   correspondence   from   the   President’s   Office   of   the   European   Parliament   that   states   that   this   type   of   lawlessness   is   a breach   of   EU   Treaties   and   harmonious   trading   within   the   EU.   The   letter   stated   that   the   EEC   expects   sincere   co-operation   and not   Authorities   deliberately   rubbishing   intellectual   property   rights.   Copy   of   the   correspondence   found   under   the   evidence pages.
The Judicial proceedings at the civil case hearings went more or less like this:
Judge: Now Mr. Perry, this is the High Court. Today we’re going to play the corruption game. OK?
           What’s going to happen is: I’m not going to give you much of a chance to speak, but anything
            you do say i’m going to either dismiss or rubbish, or just simply twist it around against you. Anything that
            they say, i’m going to eagerly lap up and agree with regardless of us all being here because of their
           clear and obvious crime. I know that some of them are also barristers which makes their claim a public
            disgrace but the High Court refuses to recognize or enforce intellectual property rights under any
           circumstances, is that understood? Ok then, lets begin…..
Defending Barrister: Oh and, Judge -  he’s also not allowed to see any evidence that proves his allegations.
Judge: Oh yeah that’s a good one - yeah, and you’re not allowed to see any evidence OK?
Audience roaring with laughter: Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Ha Ha Haaaaaa, Haaaaa Ha Ha SO FUCK YOU
entrepreneurs and business people of the United Kingdom - We FUCKED You! DO NOT INVEST YOUR MONEY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM IF IT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS BECAUSE YOU WILL LOSE IT - ALONG WITH YOUR LIFE. THERE ISN’T ANY AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL COMPENSATION THAT CAN EVER REPAIR THE DAMAGE AND TRAUMA  I HAVE SUFFERED, EVEN THOUGH IT MAY HELP REBUILD MY LIFE. HEED MY WARNING: DO NOT INVEST IN THE UNITED STINK-HOLE KINGDOM BECAUSE THESE CIRCUMSTANCES  IS THE REWARD YOU GET.

That  

is  

called  

perverting  

the  

course  

of  

justice,  

aiding,  

abetting  

and  

subornation  

to  

perjury  

and  

it  

is  

fraud  

by  

abuse  

of  

position.  

It

is  

also  

simply  

disgraceful  

conduct  

of  

someone  

in  

a  

positon  

that  

is  

supposed  

to  

be  

upholding  

the  

rights  

and  

freedoms  

of  

others.

Judge Mann is a named Defendant and there is an active City of London Police investigation (Action Fraud).

Richard  

Hacon  

had  

earlier  

deliberately  

rubbished  

my  

patent  

in  

CC13P00980  

by  

adding  

words  

into  

the  

patent  

that  

didn’t  

exist  

in

order  

to  

support  

his  

twisted  

judgement.  

He  

based  

points  

of  

his  

Judgement  

upon  

drawings  

in  

the  

patent  

that  

he  

knew  

looked

different  

to  

the  

product  

unlawfully  

manufactured  

and  

sold  

by  

the  

Defendants,  

again  

to  

substantiate  

his  

own  

judgement,  

whilst

deliberately  

ignoring  

the  

very  

next  

page  

of  

drawings  

in  

my  

patent  

that  

illustrate  

a  

product  

almost  

identical  

to  

the  

one  

the

Defendants  

had  

produced.  

Richard  

Hacon  

stated  

that  

he  

thought  

the  

fence  

bracket  

in  

question  

‘had  

to  

be  

horizontal  

in  

use’  

to

infringe  

my  

patent  

and  

related  

one  

of  

the  

drawings  

in  

the  

patent  

to  

support  

his  

statement.  

The  

Defendants  

had  

manufactured  

a

product  

where  

the  

top  

was  

positioned  

at  

a  

decline  

and  

if  

you  

look  

in  

the  

drawings  

of  

my  

patent  

and  

on  

the  

very  

next  

page,  

there

is  

another  

of  

my  

drawings  

that  

shows  

a  

product  

almost  

identical  

to  

the  

offending  

product  

manufactured  

and  

distributed  

by  

the

Defendants  

who  

claim  

‘we  

didn’t  

know  

and  

it  

was  

wasn’t  

us’.  

  

The  

Judge’s  

own  

colleague  

later  

contradicted  

him  

and  

agreed

with  

me  

that  

particular  

point  

which  

was  

the  

central  

point  

in  

proving  

patent  

infringement  

(conflicting  

findings  

of  

fact).  

Coupled

with  

the  

Defendants  

using  

my  

name  

to  

order  

the  

goods  

from  

the  

manufacturer,  

it  

proves  

intent  

and  

proves  

that  

they  

deliberately

set out to defraud me, along with all the other evidence now published throught this website.

United Kingdom Judicial Corruption & Crime Defendant Judges Yes, you read it right - ‘Defendant Judges’. This whole affair is loathsome and sickening.
London High Court and IPEC 2013 - 2017 Click Here 
London Court of Appeal, Judicial Conduct Office & Office of the Lord Chief Justice                              2013 - 2017 Click Here
Bristol High Court &                Bath County Court                   2015 - 2017 Click Here
Brief summary of the offences carried out by the judges involved: Which judge did what, in which court and when. Click the pages above for the details and evidence. Abuse of the Administration of Justice, Fraud by abuse of position and by false representation, Conspiracy to commit misconduct in Public Office, Aiding, Abetting and Subornation to Perjury, Perverting the Course of Justice, Corroboration, Dishonest Assistance, Trading in Influence, Participation in serious crime. This section of the Particulars of Claim sets out the crime and offences carried out by the Judges involved in order to aid and abet some of the other Defendants, and to follow the United Kingdom agenda of rubbishing intellectual property rights, regardless of the cost to my life and the total devastation their actions have caused. Horrifyingly, they don’t have any conscience, remorse or regret about it; they don’t give a shit what tragedy their fraudulent judgements cause as long as they prevent anyone enforcing their creative rights. For what good ????  I have pondered this many many times over the last 7 years and I cannot find a single plausible reason why the United Kingdom refuses to enforce intellectual property rights. The only reason I can think of is that because the fuddy duddy old men don’t have any IP rights and because they’ve failed in life and haven’t made it, they don’t want anyone else to be successful and the Government wants to keep everyone suppressed. It is an appalling attitude towards innovation, human capital and the future of the economy of the country. What confidence does this give anyone to invest anything at all?  We are now even at a stage where there are defendant judges committing crime. This Country has completely lost its way and it is the decay in the bones of Europe. These people don’t have any hesitation in sitting there making corrupt judgements and watching someone have their life torn apart whilst knowing that the law firms standing before them have submitted thousands of pages of false witness testimony to a United Kingdom Court of Law. That alone should see these Defendant firms landed with an immediate practice ban and prison sentence, but so far they’ve  been allowed to get away with it and the judges involved have supported it AND written judgements on paper, in black and white, to support it. This is the ugly face of corruption and it is UGLY.  It is barefaced cruelty being carried out by people who have been given positions of Authority to look after the welfare of their fellow man and uphold the rights, liberties and freedoms of others. I cannot find words to describe how sinister and sleazy the whole thing is. It makes a complete mockery of the entire justice system. I feel sorry for all of those professional people who have taken years to study to become legal practicioneers and those who have spent their lives trying to seek justice and to protect a civilized society. The entire legal profession is blackened by these dark dealings. The entire justice system is completely worthless.  I feel sorry for those people and the joke is that they don’t even know it is going on. Even the barrister who represented me for one single hearing lasting only 30 minutes spoke up and told one of the judges that if what I was saying was true “then this is what the whole thing is all about” and that if there is any bar to be set for ordering evidence to be adduced then “that bar should be fairly low if there is any bar at all”  (in relation to my reques to subpoena evidence). More of this in detail over the next few pages. The basic bones of the offences are: 1. Deliberately steering court cases in a direction that have no hope of achieveing justice for intellectual property related offences because the United Kingdom refuses to recognise the value of, or enforce, IP under any circumstances. 2. Denying all access to any evidence whatsoever that they know proves my allegations and in fact making up ludicrous reasons to prevent the evidence being adduced, and then making fraudulent judgements against me using the reason that in their view I didn’t have enough or any evidence because they’ve denied access to it. It is insulting and a total abuse of power. The fact is that the evidence I do have would land the ordinary person on the street with a lifetime prison sentence. 3. Corrorborating between one another to commit misconduct and abuse of the administration of justice. Trying to cover one another’s asses so that all of them have an excuse for their criminal actions. 4. Actually willfully committing fraud and authoring judgements that they know to be fraudulent and yet doing it anyway because they think they are untouchable and above the very law they are being paid to implement. I have undeniable proof that I will publish on the relevent pages. 5. Ratifying Court hearing tape transcripts to conceal their crimes by amending the wording, altering the dialogue or deliberately ommitting parts of conversations to conceal crime, support their fraudulent judgements and to make it appear to anyone reading the dialogue that there isn’t any crime. 6. Court Administration Offences such as: stealing evidence I submitted, attempting to bury claims so that they never see the light of day, or deliberately mishandling documents to throw cases off track or cause delays. Deliberately merging case files and then claiming that they’ve made mistakes so that correspondence couldn’t  be found or received. Clerks conspiring with the clerks of the Defendant law firms to withold paperwork from me so that I cannot reply to it in time before the judge makes an order etc. A 21st Century United Kingdom Court of Law claiming that they don’t have the means to view video evidence on a memory stick and then stealing those memory sticks so that it doesn’t get to the Court in time. Clerks deliberately misadvising me to run me around in circles to try to make me ‘give up’ so that I can’t enforce my rights. Judges claiming that they don’t know who Action Fraud is (to the reader this is the City of London Police). Deliberately pretending that they don’t have any power to investigate or dig deeper into the situation so that I never had any chance to litigate a claim for fraud or other serious offences. It goes on…. These judges do not deserve to hold judicial office and I would like them removed from Authority.
<< Back to  Particulars Index Page << Back to  Particulars Index Page